Eskdalemuir was chosen as the site for the observatory due to its remote location. Eskdalemuir is the site of the Eskdalemuir Observatory, a station built in 1904 that monitors climate, solar radiation, pollution levels, geomagnetic fields, and seismological events. These sites include two stone circles that date back to Neolithic time: Castle Oér, the possible ritual center for the Selgoyae people, and the Roman fort of Raeburnfoot that was later a fortification and settlement during the Dark Ages. They have now taken this type of torpedo out of service.The area surrounding Eskdalemuir contains a large number of archeological sites. Since this programme was first shown, Russian officials have admitted they placed 'unfounded trust' in torpedoes powered by HTP. A chemical reaction between HTP and the metal torpedo case could cause a chain of explosions with a seismic trace similar to that observed on the day of the disaster. The most plausible cause is a leak of hydrogen peroxide, known as HTP, used in the Kursk torpedoes' fuel system. And as the scientists uncover the truth about what happened all those years ago, they may also solve the mystery of what really sank the Kursk. The scientists' investigations take them back to a little-known submarine disaster that occurred almost fifty years ago: not in Russia, but in Britain.

Through a detailed forensic detective story, seismologists have now been able to establish that the Kursk sank because of an explosion, not a collision.īut what had exploded? Horizon follows torpedo designers and chemists as they try to track down the precise cause of the explosion.

The disaster left a series of geophysical fingerprints. With access to the very latest scientific research, Horizon tells the story of the alternative theory that shows that it probably wasn't a collision, and may point to the true cause of the tragedy. However, new scientific evidence suggests that the Russians were wrong. Satellite photographs and underwater footage all seemed to point to the Russian suspicions being correct. And above all, the Russians believed they had found overwhelming evidence showing the Kursk sank as a result of a collision with an American submarine. There is also a long history of collisions between US and Russian submarines in the Barents Sea. During the naval exercises there had indeed been two American submarines out in the Barents Sea, spying on the Russian weaponry and tactics. But the Russian suspicions were based on logic. The Russians eventually claimed an American spy submarine had collided with the Kursk, causing her to sink - a claim the Americans flatly deny. One overriding question dominated the aftermath of the disaster: what had caused the submarine to sink? As theories and counter-theories have multiplied, this mystery has been mired in confusion and acrimony. But the rescue efforts were in vain - all the sailors onboard had perished. How could this submarine have foundered?įor a week after the tragedy the world watched in horror, as divers struggled to reach the crew trapped inside the Kursk. But to many the tragedy remains incomprehensible, for the Kursk had been built to be unsinkable. It was a tragedy which shocked the world. In August 2000, the Russian submarine, the Kursk, sank with the loss of 118 lives.

Kursk submarine seiamic